Saturday, March 24, 2012

Comments on my PI essay?

So I'm pretty sure we were supposed to make a post so people could review our PI essays?...If so, that's what this is for hahaha.

3 comments:

  1. It's a good, readable portrait of hooks, helping readers get a sense not only of the woman but of the broader sweep of the feminist movement. I raised a challenge to Jackie about her criticism of second-wave feminism, but not that it's wrong, just that it's provocative and worth more conversation. I wonder what others in our course think about feminism and its future.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I wanted to make a comment on your essay but the feature is not available on the same page as that essay. So, I will comment here.

    Until reading your essay I had never known that someone like bell hooks existed and I am grateful that you chose to write about her so that more of us could get to know her as fondly as you seem to.

    The most interesting part that I felt helped to define the direction of your essay and bell hooks herself was your paragraph on her pen name. Her decision for the name to be lower-case is genius and adds a soft but direct message I am sure to everything she advocates. I agree with you also on the fact that what may be criticized as a weakness is in fact a strength. She seems to have no fear in expressing her point in a personal and open manner and that certainly speaks volumes to a general public. Open expression is far more effective in reaching out than any pieced steeped in academic jargon and references.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thank you for reading, Deanna! I always appreciate how carefully you read and the feedback you give.

    ReplyDelete